RunasSudo
/
PointsOfOrder
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

Edition 0.3.1 

Correct typo
This commit is contained in:
RunasSudo 2021-02-25 01:42:13 +11:00
parent e8ca33f53d
commit e934e8949c
Signed by: RunasSudo
GPG Key ID: 7234E476BF21C61A
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
conf.py
View File

@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ copyright = '2021 Lee Yingtong Li'
author = 'Lee Yingtong Li'
# The full version, including alpha/beta/rc tags
release = '0.3.1-dev'
release = '0.3.1'
version = release

2
epub-copyright.xhtml
View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
</head><body>
<p>Edition 0.1 first published 2018<br/>
Edition 0.2 first published 2021<br/>
Edition 0.3.1-dev first published 2021</p>
Edition 0.3.1 first published 2021</p>
<p><a href="https://yingtongli.me/pointsoforder">https://yingtongli.me/pointsoforder</a></p>
<p>Copyright © 2021 Lee Yingtong Li. You may use this book, at your option, under either of the following licences:
<ul><li>the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence</a></li>

2
preamble.tex.txt
View File

@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
\begingroup\footnotesize
Edition 0.1 first published 2018 \\
Edition 0.2 first published 2021 \\
Edition 0.3.1-dev first published 2021
Edition 0.3.1 first published 2021
\vspace{1cm}

2
transacting-business.rst
View File

@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ Like motions, there are a number of rules that amendments must comply with:
Some authorities provide that amendments must be moved in the order they affect the motion, i.e. no amendment may be moved to part of a motion preceding a part previously proposed to be amended.\ [#fn79]_ The author feels this approach to be unnecessarily restrictive, but if it is to be followed, it would be prudent, when an amendment is moved, for the Chair to ask if anyone wishes to propose an amendment to an earlier part of the motion, which would then be considered first.
Additionally, some authorities provide that an amendment may not be itself amended (a *second-degree amendment*), and that alternative amendments should instead be mref:`foreshadowed <foreshadowing-amendments>`.\ [#fn62]_ This has the advantage of avoiding the potentially confusing conceptual complexity of ‘amending an amendment’, but the author believes that a strict prohibition is too strong. The author recommends that the body's standing orders specify that the Chair *may* decline to accept a second-degree amendment at their discretion, and that an amendment to a second-degree amendment is out of order.
Additionally, some authorities provide that an amendment may not be itself amended (a *second-degree amendment*), and that alternative amendments should instead be :mref:`foreshadowed <foreshadowing-amendments>`.\ [#fn62]_ This has the advantage of avoiding the potentially confusing conceptual complexity of ‘amending an amendment’, but the author believes that a strict prohibition is too strong. The author recommends that the body's standing orders specify that the Chair *may* decline to accept a second-degree amendment at their discretion, and that an amendment to a second-degree amendment is out of order.
Moving and proceeding with amendments
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^